Fill in a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template

1. Failing to provide complete names in the NAME section. Ensure that the last name, first name, and middle initial are all included.

2. Omitting the SSN or DOD ID No.. This information is critical for identification and processing.

3. Incorrectly entering the RANK or DATE OF RANK. Double-check these entries to avoid discrepancies.

4. Not specifying the REASON FOR SUBMISSION. This section is necessary for understanding the context of the evaluation.

5. Forgetting to include the RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS. An email address is needed for communication regarding the evaluation.

6. Neglecting to sign and date the form in the AUTHENTICATION section. Signatures are essential for validation.

7. Leaving the PERIOD COVERED section incomplete. Clearly indicate the start and end dates of the evaluation period.

1. What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

   The DA 2166 9 1 form is used to evaluate the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. It serves as a record of an NCO's achievements, responsibilities, and overall potential. This evaluation is crucial for promotions, assignments, and career development within the Army.

2. Who should complete the DA 2166 9 1 form?

   The form must be completed by the rater, who is typically the immediate supervisor of the rated NCO. The senior rater, who is usually a higher-ranking officer, also reviews and signs the form. The rated NCO must also sign the form to acknowledge that they have seen the completed report.

3. What information is required in Part I of the form?

   Part I includes administrative data such as the NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID Number), rank, date of rank, unit, and the period covered by the evaluation. This section ensures that all essential details about the rated NCO are accurately recorded.

4. What does the rater evaluate in Part IV?

   In Part IV, the rater assesses various attributes of the NCO, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievements. Each area is rated as either "MET" or "DID NOT MEET STANDARD," along with comments that provide context for the ratings. This section is critical for understanding the NCO's performance in different aspects of their role.

5. What is the significance of the senior rater's evaluation?

   The senior rater provides an overall assessment of the NCO's potential compared to others in the same grade. This evaluation can significantly impact the NCO's career trajectory, as it helps determine their readiness for promotion and future assignments.

6. What is the appeals process mentioned in the form?

   The appeals process allows the rated NCO to contest the evaluation if they believe it is unfair or inaccurate. The details of this process are outlined in Army Regulation 623-3. Understanding this process is important for NCOs who may wish to challenge their ratings.

7. What are the requirements for the rater's signature?

   The rater must sign and date the form to authenticate the evaluation. This signature indicates that the rater has completed the assessment and that all information provided is accurate. The rater's email address must also be included for verification purposes.

8. What should the rated NCO do after signing the form?

   After signing the form, the rated NCO should ensure that they understand the content of the evaluation and the implications of their ratings. They should also keep a copy of the report for their records, as it may be useful for future evaluations or discussions about their career.

9. How often is the DA 2166 9 1 form submitted?

   The DA 2166 9 1 form is typically submitted annually or at the end of a specified rating period. However, it can also be submitted at other times, such as during a change of duty assignment or when significant changes in performance occur.

The DA 2166 9 1 form, used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), is often surrounded by misconceptions. Here are five common misunderstandings:

• Misconception 1: The form is only relevant for promotions.

This is incorrect. While the DA 2166 9 1 form can influence promotion decisions, it serves multiple purposes, including performance evaluations, career development, and identifying areas for improvement.

• Misconception 2: The NCO must agree with the evaluation to sign the form.

Signing the form does not imply agreement with the assessment. The rated NCO's signature confirms the accuracy of the administrative data and acknowledges awareness of the evaluation process.

• Misconception 3: Only the rater completes the performance evaluation section.

While the rater primarily fills out this section, the senior rater also provides input regarding the NCO's overall potential. Both evaluations contribute to a comprehensive assessment.

• Misconception 4: The form is a one-time document and is not revisited.

This is misleading. The DA 2166 9 1 form is part of an ongoing evaluation process. Regular counseling and feedback sessions are encouraged to ensure continuous development and improvement.

• Misconception 5: The performance evaluation is solely based on quantitative metrics.

Although metrics like the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) are included, qualitative assessments of leadership, character, and professional attributes are equally important in determining an NCO's overall performance.